Comparative Analysis of ARIMA and Random Forest Regression Models in Predicting Money Supply Trends
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper collects monthly data of money supply over an extended period, including eight indicators: money and quasi-money, its year-on-year growth, currency and its year-on-year growth, cash in circulation and its year-on-year growth, current deposit and its year-on-year growth. Two distinct modeling approaches, the ARIMA model and the random forest regression model, are employed to analyze these data. In the ARIMA model, only the money and quasi-money data are utilized, whereas in the random forest regression model, money and quasi-money are treated as dependent variables with the other indicators serving as independent variables. Despite the variations in data usage between the two models, their predictive performances are comparable.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Mind forge Academia also operates under the Creative Commons Licence CC-BY 4.0. This allows for copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. The premise is that you must provide appropriate citation information.